Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith, believes himself to be justified by law, in doing it.
Illustration.
A sees Z commit what appears to A to be a murder. A, in the exercise, to the best of his judgment exerted in good faith, of the power which the law gives to all persons of apprehending murderers in the fact, seizes Z, in order to bring Z before the proper authorities. A has committed no offence, though it may turn out that Z was acting in self-defence.
Comments
Section 17 of BNS, 2023 protects acts which are justified by law or are bona fide believed, by mistake of fact, to be justified by law. This can be understood by case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. N. Venugopal, the accused were all policeman, they arrested a person on the suspicion of receiver of stolen property and entered house by breaking it. Three days after arrest, arrested person was found dead. The accused were charged with offences under section 348, 331 and 201 of IPC. The HC stated that the act is justified. However, the Supreme Cour stated that there is no reasonable apprehension between the act and the provision. Therefore, the act is not justified.
Here in the above case, it can be seen that it is not justified anywhere in the law that a person can be killed for stealing property by police officers.
Corresponding Section
Section 17 of BNS, 2023 corresponds with section 79 of IPC, 1860.
Comments are written by Jeet Sinha
To read BNS commentary click here.
Written by Priyanshu Rani ABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONUNDERSTANDING GENDER JUSTICEINTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAPPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW…
IntroductionObjectivesSignificant changes brought by the SHANTI ActTerritorial jurisdictionEntry of private sectorsOperator’s right of recourseFixation of…
The ChallengeReal Meaning of EducationWay Forward The Challenge The Delhi HC decision that Law Schools…
IntroductionFactual background of the caseIssues involvedArguments of the partiesAlbaniaUnited KingdomFindings of the CourtReasoning of the…
Case Title: Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.IntroductionFactsIssueArguments by AppellantsArguments by RespondentAmicus…
AbstractNON-STATE ACTORS AND TERRORISM UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWSEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS AS THE GENESIS OF ‘WAR ON…