—In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the offender shall be punished for the offence for which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all.
Section 10 of the Bharitya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (BNS) ensures fairness in sentencing when there is doubt about which specific offence an accused has committed out of multiple possible offences.
Section 10 of BNS, 2023 upholds the principle of “benefit of the doubt” in criminal justice by ensuring that ambiguity in identifying the exact offence leads to the least severe punishment.
Section 10 of BNS, 2023 corresponds with Section 72 of IPC, 1860.
Sahab Singh alias Sat Pal v. State of Haryana: Conviction Cannot Rest on Unreliable “Last…
IntroductionBackground of the CaseHigh Court Had Earlier Refused To Quash ProceedingsPrinciple: Informant Is Not Always…
IntroductionThree-Year LimitationGovernment Power Is Not UnlimitedProtection of Property RightsConclusionFAQs Introduction The Supreme Court has held…
IntroductionAbetment Requires More Than a Troubled MarriageCriminal Liability Cannot Be Based on General AllegationsConclusionFAQs Case:…
IntroductionWhat Actually HappenedAI Cannot Replace Legal VerificationWhy the Judgment MattersShould AI Be Used in the…
Author: Jeet Sinha Introduction1. What is an Original Application before the NGT?2. Basic Structure of…