BNS

Section 11, Solitary confinement, The Bharitya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)

Section 11. Solitary confinement.

Whenever any person is convicted of an offence for which under this Sanhita the Court has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment, the Court may, by its sentence, order that the offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to which he is sentenced, not exceeding three months in the whole, according to the following scale, namely:

(a) a time not exceeding one month if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months;

(b) a time not exceeding two months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and shall not exceed one year;

(c) a time not exceeding three months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year.

Comments

Section 11 of the Bharitya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (BNS) regulates the use of solitary confinement as part of punishment for offences where rigorous imprisonment is prescribed.

  1. Key Provision:
    Courts can order solitary confinement for a portion of the imprisonment, but it cannot exceed three months in total. The duration depends on the length of the imprisonment term:
    • (a): If imprisonment is up to 6 months, solitary confinement can be for a maximum of 1 month.
    • (b): If imprisonment exceeds 6 months but is within 1 year, solitary confinement can be up to 2 months.
    • (c): If imprisonment exceeds 1 year, solitary confinement can be up to 3 months.
  2. Objective:
    The provision allows for limited and proportionate solitary confinement to ensure the punishment aligns with the severity of the offence, while preventing excessive isolation.

Section 11 of the BNS, 2023 balances punishment with humane treatment by setting strict limits on solitary confinement duration based on the imprisonment term.

Corresponding Section

Section 11 of the BNS, 2023 corresponds with Section 73 of the IPC, 1860.

Jeet Sinha

Recent Posts

The Intersection of International Law and Gender Justice: The Role of Supreme Court of India

Written by Priyanshu Rani ABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONUNDERSTANDING GENDER JUSTICEINTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAPPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW…

3 weeks ago

Overview of the SHANTI Act, 2025

IntroductionObjectivesSignificant changes brought by the SHANTI ActTerritorial jurisdictionEntry of private sectorsOperator’s right of recourseFixation of…

3 weeks ago

Education Is Not Attendance: Analyzing the Current University benchmark of 75% attendance in light of Delhi HC Judgment

The ChallengeReal Meaning of EducationWay Forward The Challenge The Delhi HC decision that Law Schools…

4 weeks ago

Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania) 1949 – A Landmark Case in International Law

IntroductionFactual background of the caseIssues involvedArguments of the partiesAlbaniaUnited KingdomFindings of the CourtReasoning of the…

2 months ago

Is It Mandatory to Provide the Grounds of Arrest in Writing? Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (2025)

Case Title: Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.IntroductionFactsIssueArguments by AppellantsArguments by RespondentAmicus…

2 months ago

Justifying Force Under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter in Response to the Armed Attacks by Terrorist Organizations

AbstractNON-STATE ACTORS AND TERRORISM UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWSEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS AS THE GENESIS OF ‘WAR ON…

3 months ago